365 Days. 365 Films.

Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis star in this feisty rom-com about two friends who decide to have no-strings-attached sex. As with all rom-coms the problems start when they begin to have feelings for each other and they must now figure out what to do about their accidental relationship.

I have to say that this is one of the funnier romantic comedies to come out in recent years and the comedy is definitely more prominent than the romance which may be a plus for some viewers. It's not a particularly girly film which makes for a more diverse audience, however the sense of humour may only appeal to some.

In terms of the acting, Timberlake surprises and Kunis' comedy timing is impeccable, but there are a few loose ends in the dialogue. It was never going to be a perfect film and it was never going to win any Oscars, but it is enjoyable and should make you laugh. Overall it's above average and so deserving of a little more than a three star rating.

Rowan Atkinson is back as Johnny English in this sequel to the 2003 spy comedy. Not a lot was promised for this film by the distribution company, and rightfully so. It’s just as disappointing and slightly below average as the first, but maybe with a better cast this time round.
 
I don’t know what it is about Johnny English that I don’t really like. Perhaps it’s the style of comedy that only young teens would find funny with today’s standards. The reason I wanted to watch this film was because I found the first film funny… When I was 13! Watching it at the age of 22 was sorely disappointing.
I laughed a few times, mostly at the shame I felt for watching such a terrible film, and on that basis I will say that it’s vaguely entertaining. But unless you’re 13 or on drugs, don’t bother.

Contagion follows a number of characters as a deadly disease spreads worldwide in a matter of days. As the CDC attempt to control the outbreak and find a cure, Mitch (Damon) is trying to keep his daughter safe as their world falls apart.

This was publicised as one of the scariest films of 2011 and I believe it was. It’s not a horror film, it isn’t jumpy and you won’t be hiding behind the sofa, but there is some gore and the fear of what could happen in the future. Since Swine Flu and Bird Flu, people have been dramatising a worldwide outbreak a la 28 Days Later, and this film shows exactly how it would pan out. Realism = scary!

Soderbergh’s direction is seamless, taking you right inside the story and, despite characterization being finely spread across a number of roles, you get a close and personal feel for the characters. Overall it is an enjoyable and thought provoking film. It’ll never be a classic but it will always be in the back of my mind.

Sean Penn directs this true story about a young man who, upon graduating, gives all his money and possessions to charity to live in the wild. With him he takes only the essentials for survival including several books on how to survive in the wilderness.

I did enjoy this film for what it was and I thought that the direction was stunning, however I was not in a great state of being when I watched it which made it easier to pick out faults along with my cohorts. After watching this in the state we were in, besides some continuity confusion, Into The Wild got away with minor surface scratches and so deserving of its rating.

I have to set aside a small paragraph for Emile Hirsch – our protagonist, Chris McCandless – whose performance in this was impeccable. For a film with not a great deal going on narratively, he did liven up the atmosphere in most of the ‘quieter’ scenes and so it’s definitely worth watching for his performance. I would say, however, that it is a bit of an effort to watch because of the length of the film and because not a lot happens – it’s easy to get bored if you’re in the wrong mood – but try to give it a chance because if you do, you will love it.

Just don’t watch it while you're hungover…

One year after Bananas was released, Allen released this ‘informative’ guide on the more taboo and unanswered questions about sex based on the book of the same name. This is, again, a little absurd but rather than the slapstick comedy that Allen was overdriving only a year earlier, Allen combines his classic neurotic wit with ludicrous scenarios in uncomfortable or bizarre sexual circumstances.
I think that this has to be my favourite early Allen movie because in earlier films to this Allen’s trademark wit is clearly evident, however it is in this film where he really finds his feet. This isn’t a great film that you can watch and get involved with – it’s more of a Monty Python style sketch movie – it’s funny, rude but you can’t exactly call it an amazing movie in comparison to, say, Gone With The Wind…

I would have to say, however, that this is a must-see film for any Woody Allen fans if only to see the development of his comedic styles and influences through the decades. It may not have you laughing out loud but it will make you cringe, snigger and smirk.

This is probably the most absurd Allen film I’ve seen to date and yet it’s still loaded with social and political criticism bound by Allen’s classic wit. Allen’s character Fielding Mellish is dumped by his political activist girlfriend and in an attempt to win her back he travels to a small Latin American country, throwing himself half-heartedly into the countries revolution against it’s fascist leader.

This is a fairly early example of Allen’s written work, especially for the screen, since most of his work before this was written for the stage or for TV. This is evident in his use of physical comedy – something the later Allen fans may have only caught glimpses of in his more recent work. For me, Allen has an intelligent sense of humour and so the slapstick was a slightly frustrating replacement for what I’m used to with him, but it was funny nonetheless.

Bananas is not one of Allen’s best films although it isn’t as dated as it should be and the sense of humour is exactly as expected.

As some of you might know by now, I don’t always do research on a film before I watch it. Another thing you might have gathered about me is that I am a massive Woody Allen fan. Now, I didn’t know that this was a film at all associated with Woody Allen (I didn’t even know who starred in it) until half way through the opening sequence – shots of paris, day and night, sunny and raining with old music playing in the background. The picture and music fades to black, and there is Allen’s typical white on black opening credits using the same font he has used for decades of wonderful filmmaking. With no prior knowledge of this film, I instantly knew it was the work of Woody Allen.

If you’re an Allen fan too, you ought to love this story of a man who loses touch with his fiancee and so, on a lonely night drinking in Paris he gets lost and decides to rest on some steps. Suddenly an old fashioned car pulls up and some people beckon him inside, taking him back to the era he loves the most – the 1920s. Each and every night from then on he waits in that spot where, when the clock strikes midnight, he gets whisked away meeting his idols such as F. Scott Fitzgerald and Pablo Picasso.

You may think that this sounds like a children’s film, or perhaps just a little too unrealistic for you, but if you know Woody Allen you know his sense of humour and, more importantly, his wild imagination. This has Allen written all over it and it’s much closer to his classics than anything else he’s done recently which is brilliant.

One thing I didn’t expect was Owen Wilson giving an amazing performance – not that he is a bad actor, but the kind of films he does never really shows off his talent. I can clearly see why Allen wanted him in this film – his comedy and acting style is very similar to Allen in his day. I never noticed it before but if you watch closely it almost seems like you’re watching Allen acting again.

It is not surprising that this film has been nominated for a million and one awards this award season, it’s directed by Spielberg (arguably the world’s greatest living director), it’s set during WWI (and a lot of Oscar winners/nominees are set during a war of some sort) and it goes one better than a human interest story by having a horse as the main character.

War Horse is like a bigger budget Black Beauty at war – it’s a very inspirational and beautiful story, but it can be a bit too soppy from time to time. There are the occasional moments where you just have to cringe and mostly at the lead’s performance (Jeremy Irvine – not the horse) and the aforementioned sop.

Besides all this it is a fantastically entertaining film with stunning special effects and a wonderfully written narrative – definitely a brilliant family film as Spielberg is prone to make. The cinematography in particular is outstanding and although it has been said that Spielberg is a typical fourth wall director, his genius subtlety definitely drops in this one and I think it makes for stunning viewing that way too.

I think it will win the Best Picture Oscar, but only for the reasons stated in the first paragraph of this review – it has all the usual elements for an Oscar winner, but because of the slightly off-putting soppiness, I don’t think it’s thoroughly deserving considering it’s competition.

The first Sex and the City film follows on from the hit TV show 3 years on. The movie features all the shows favourite characters and is ultimately about Carrie and Big’s on-off relationship.

I have not been a fan of the show for a long time, in fact, it has only been in the past year that I’ve managed to get through the series from 1-6 and I had to watch this as soon as I finished it. Although I was around eight years late in watching and falling in love with this series, it is a brilliant and very amusing show for any woman to enjoy. This film, however, did fall a little short of the mark.

The actors in the film are as good as they were in the show; Carrie, Miranda, Charlotte and Samantha are the perfect protagonists each played with enthusiasm by the SATC gang. The story is great and advances the characters’ lives by as much as a whole series (not surprising when you see the running time), but despite all that there is definitely something missing. Maybe it’s too much in one hit, maybe the comedy was lacking but it’s difficult to tell in what is essentially five episodes mashed into one. I would say that this is only really worth a watch if you’re a huge fan of the show – if you’re not it might not make sense and the storylines will probably not affect you at all either.

It’s average, yes, but it still won’t stop me from watching the second movie – it’s so moreish!

Based on the novel by Stephen King, Thinner is about an obese lawyer who accidentally runs over an old gypsy woman while receiving a blow job in his car. He is then cursed by the gypsy’s father to lose weight, which doesn’t sound like such a bad curse, until he realises that he cannot stop the weight loss no matter how much he eats and that it will eventually kill him. He is then forced to ask for assistance from a friend in the mafia to find the gypsy’s father and get him to lift the curse.

I did not know the premise of the film before I sat down and watched this, but about halfway through it dawned on me that Stephen King can actually create a story out of the simplest and sometimes weak ideas. I am not trying to criticise Stephen King – I think that he is a brilliant writer and the novel is probably a hell of a lot better than the film, but let’s face it – he doesn’t really need a great idea to write a great novel, which is something that perhaps makes him stand out from the crowd. This film, however, is unfortunately not as good as King’s writing. It is bordering on bad/average – I didn’t exactly hate it and on a very shallow level I guess I kind of enjoyed it.
It’s not a film I would recommend because it’s a roller coaster of okay and bad bits, but simply for the weak storyline – sorry, Stephen – I’m only giving it 2 stars.

The Artist is a new silent movie about the early days in cinema when ‘talkies’ started to take over the movie business. Jean Dujardin stars as George Valentin, a silent movie star whose career takes a turn for the worse when sound hits the big screen, which isn’t helped by his off screen love affair with the new face of talking cinema.
Everyone has been saying how original this film is, when in fact it isn’t – silent films were the norm before 1927, and even in the 1970s Mel Brooks made Silent Movie. These are the things that were going through my mind as I began to watch this film – How original could it really be? In actual fact, by utilising the primitive aspects of cinema to their advantage, they are able to create a piece of art, not just a movie.

This is a film about film, taking it’s audience back to a time when it was all new, when films were a novelty and when only a few films opened each week. The Artist is a novelty to modern day audiences and it is a very entertaining film containing everything you might hope for in a film these days, but more than the novelty of it, it is a genuinely beautiful piece of cinema that will make you laugh, cry and want to discover more about earlier cinema.

The first Cars movie was a hit with children all over the world, but probably the lowest rated Pixar film among adults. This second instalment focuses on Mater as he is mistaken for a secret agent by two British spies, and it is even more boring than the first.

I didn’t mind the first film, a lot of people told me that they really didn’t like it, but I thought it was okay – not half as funny as any other Pixar film, but I could see why the kids loved it. This one, on the other hand, is so dull that I couldn’t possibly concentrate on the details of the film and so I don’t think that children, who typically have a lower attention span than adults, will be able to focus on it either.
It isn’t a terrible film, the animation is still as stunning as ever and it’s generally better than some other animations that come out these days, but it’s definitely not up to scratch when you consider the best of Pixar.
I sincerely hope that this is the last Cars movie, the first was average, this was bland and so if they make a third, it will inevitably be terrible.

Cameron Diaz (Joy) and Ashton Kutcher (Jack) star in Tom Vaughan’s ‘The Hangover’ style comedy in which Joy goes to Vegas with her friend to get over a bad break-up, and Jack goes with his friend to mourn the loss of his job. They accidentally get booked into the same room and end up going for a drink which gets a little out of hand. While inebriated they get married, but before they can arrange an annulment, Jack wins $3 million on the slots using Joy’s quarter, and suddenly marriage doesn’t seem such a bad idea.

In court they each attempt to claim the money, but the judge sentences them to six months marriage with counselling before they can rightfully split it as marital assets in the divorce. Joy then moves in with Jack and it becomes a game of who will crack first as they attempt to live together, each finding the other intolerable.

It’s not a great movie and considering the amount of good romantic comedies there have been in recent years (most of which star Diaz), it is a little disappointing, even still it isn’t surprising either considering the amount of trash that has come out too. This isn’t trash, neither is it a film you should or would watch more than once, it’s more of a film that you really shouldn’t like, but it’s better than you thought it would be – better than you thought, but still mind-numbing – easy to write, easy to watch, but not a great film.

The only reason I wanted to watch this film is because, as a child, I was a huge Yogi fan. In fact, my parents actually still call me Boo Boo because I loved it so much. I can now say that my childhood dreams have been shattered with a lower than average standard film. The second reason I wanted to watch this is because of the voice actors; Dan Aykroyd playing Yogi and Justin Timberlake playing Boo Boo. I can, thankfully, say that the voice actors had gotten it spot on – they were perfect.

What I didn’t like about the film was the decision to make it live action – Yogi looked particularly terrifying as a CGI character in a real world – and this decision also left an opening for Anna Farris. Something I did like about the film was the odd hint of a good sense of humour for both kids and adults and also the film seems to be a mash up of movie homages which is, I think, the only way they could force people to relate and remain interested.

Overall it’s terribly directed and very cheaply made considering their ambitious use of CGI. It appears they made their expensive seeming bed and then refused to lie in it when they realised how much it would cost. Instead they try to ruin children’s minds with a terrifying Yogi bear, and fool them with poorly shot sequences. It’s a sad day for Brevig when someone like me watches his film and decides that they could have actually directed it better.

As a huge fan of the Mission Impossible films, I was delighted to hear of a fourth film! Not long after hearing about the film’s then current production, I learned that Simon Pegg, a.k.a. the love of my life, would be starring alongside Tom Cruise playing a much bigger role than what he did in the third film, so the film was already in my good books. After going to see it in the cinema, despite my high hopes, I was not disappointed.

The film displays all the action and thrills that you have experienced from the other three movies, and I believe that this has to be the best action film of 2011. The stunts are mind-blowing and mostly (if not all) done by Mr Cruise himself! What really gets me going with these kind of films are the disguises and prosthetics they use to go undercover – I know it’s a small aspect to any spy film but I love it and this film, again, delivered.

The first film was ground-breaking, the second fairly average, the third was great and this is even better – perhaps not as good as the first, but it has everything the other three films have, plus a refreshing bit of comic relief from Pegg.

Billy Bob Thornton is Willie, a drunk and a criminal who earns money over the holidays playing Santa in malls for the children while hatching plans with his friend to rob the stores they work alongside. One day at work he meets a young boy who, despite Willie’s drunken and slightly abusive behaviour towards him, idolizes him and believes him to be the real Santa. When Willie realises that the police are after him, he moves in to the young boy’s house where he is living with only a senile grandmother.

The concept for this film is great but I thought they could have done a lot more with it, or sometimes less with the comedy. I thought the jokes may have gone too far sometimes and it distracted from what it should have been. I realise that Billy Bob Thornton probably enjoyed playing this role and that he was the only man for it, but I did expect the character to be a little more like Bill Murray’s Scrooged character, especially in how he acts towards children. Instead it was sad and sometimes distasteful and it rarely got a laugh out of me, however it is a nice and refreshing take on the standard Christmas movie narrative.

Dudley Moore and Liza Minnelli star in this romantic comedy about an eccentric millionaire who falls for a working class woman living in Queens and working as a waitress. When Arthur’s grandmother assures him that she will cut off all of his assets if he chooses to marry anyone but his wealthy betrothed, he is forced to decide between love and the high life.

I can’t say that this is a great film but it’s certainly amusing; Dudley Moore is hugely entertaining playing drunk and Liza Minnelli is as charming as ever. The comedy itself, besides the mild amusement of Arthur’s drunken slurs, is unsatisfying enough to uncategorize it from the comedy genre, but having said that, although you may not be falling off your seat laughing, it does ‘feel’ like a comedy film in that it’s incredibly easy to watch.

Apparently they made a sequel to this film which I’m intrigued about but not entirely sure I want to go through with watching it. I don’t know where they could have taken the story to it since the depth of the characters was minimal and the narrative stale and cold. It’s enjoyable for the casual film viewer who wants nothing but to vegetate in front of the television, but if you prefer a little more from a film, this probably isn’t for you.

I would say that, overall, it’s average, at best, but simply because of the acting talents, I’m giving it three stars.

Susan Sarandon is a nun, Sister Prejean, who is asked to be the spiritual advisor of convicted murderer Matthew Poncelet, played by Sean Penn. Although Matthew claims not to have actually committed murder, he is sentenced to execution and must redeem himself and his faith before his time is up.

I’m not going to lie, it isn’t the easiest film to watch… The performances of both Sarandon and Penn are unbelievable – easily the best performances from each of them, making this a very moving film and a struggle to watch emotionally.

The film is directed by actor Tim Robbins, and I believe that this is the first film I have seen to be directed by him, but he is a brilliant director. He has a rather subtle tone in his direction, utilising his actors to provoke the main thoughts and emotions, but he compliments their performances with his use of camera angles and movements.

This is a film similar to The Green Mile, but perhaps without the slightly supernatural element to it. It is plainly and simply a film about a man’s emotional struggles in his final days before he is executed. Not for the easily shocked or overly emotional, this will not be an easy film to watch, but if you do watch it, you will love it for all the right reasons.

This is a true story about Charlie Wilson’s contribution to one of the largest every CIA operations to supply Afghanistan with military weapons to fight the Soviet Union in their war. Tom Hanks stars as Wilson in this adaptation of his work as a Texas congressman which turns out to be a very funny and enjoyable movie.

This is not, as you expect from the plot, a war film as such, nor is it a particularly serious film about a country’s struggles for freedom, but it is more about Wilson himself; a light-hearted and fun-loving man trying to help a then deprived country. What surprised me about this film is that Julia Roberts was brilliant. This is not to say that she is a bad actress – I don’t believe that at all – but not since Erin Brokovich have I actually thought she was anything more than “pretty good”. She does tend to play the same character and there is rarely anything special about her performance, however I do think that she played her character in this film with a lot of depth; she really brought her to life in this.

Whether you know anything about politics, religion, war or history, this film is well worth a watch – not unmissable, but definitely a great film.

This film is based on a true story about the closure of the Northern English mines which could mean the end of a group of miners’ brass band. This is a rather upsetting film due to the subject matter, but with the film being, primarily, a comedy, it’s much easier to watch than you might think.

It is enjoyable and uplifting in the same way that The Full Monty is, and shares Monty’s spot as one of the greatest British films of recent years. Stars Ewan McGregor, Pete Postlethwaite and Tara Fitzgerald are amazing and they fill the movie with so much emotion that you really would have to be dead inside not to be moved by their spectacular performances or indeed the subject matter itself. It is easily the greatest performance by the late and great Postlethwaite too.

Brassed Off is a classic piece of British cinema and depicts an important part of Britain’s recent history immortalised in great form, but it is perhaps not for those who are easily upset.